



Recruiting News Network
Recruiting
News
OperationsThe Recruiting Worx PodcastMoney + InvestmentsCareer AdviceWorld
Tech
DEI
People
People on the Move
The Leaders
The Makers
People
People on the Move
The Leaders
The Makers
Brand +
Marketing
Events
Labor +
Economics
SUBSCRIBE





Worklife

'Ignorance is not going to be an excuse': Lessons from Facebook's hiring scandal

RNN News Update

November 17, 2021

Worklife

'Ignorance is not going to be an excuse': Lessons from Facebook's hiring scandal

RNN News Update

November 17, 2021

Photo by Alexander Shatov on Unsplash

When the U.S. Department of Justice sued Facebook last December for intentional discrimination against U.S. applicants, it issued a warning to others: "Our message to all employers — including those in the technology sector — is clear: you cannot illegally prefer to recruit, consider, or hire temporary visa holders over U.S. workers."

DOJ's message echoed last month when the agency announced a settlement resolving its claims with the social media giant. Facebook will pay a $4.75 million civil penalty to the U.S. It will also pay up to $9.5 million to the applicants impacted by its alleged discrimination.

The allegations against Facebook may offer employers some lessons as they attempt to heed DOJ's warning. The biggest lesson, according to Norris McLaughlin Member Raymond G. Lahoud, is that employers must keep recruiting efforts consistent among applicants, no matter their citizenship status.

Unpacking the claims against Facebook

In its December 2020 lawsuit, DOJ claimed "Facebook refused to recruit, consider, or hire qualified and available U.S. workers for over 2,600 positions that Facebook, instead, reserved for temporary visa holders it sponsored for permanent work authorization."

The agency claimed that between January 2018 and September 2019, Facebook reserved jobs for temporary visa holders through the U.S. Department of Labor's Permanent Labor Certification Process. During this time, Facebook did not hire anyone for the 2,606 PERM-related roles except for PERM beneficiaries.

According to DOJ's lawsuit, Facebook's recruiting methods for these positions deviated from the procedure it used for other roles. The adjusted methods were "designed to deter U.S. workers from applying to certain positions," DOJ said. The lawsuit claimed Facebook required, for example, that applications be submitted by mail only. Facebook also did not post about certain job vacancies on its career website. And it refused to review applications submitted by workers in the U.S.

For the rest of this article, please visit HR Dive

Facebook will pay up to $9.5 million to those impacted by its alleged discrimination against U.S. applicants

What we're reading

‘We’re all fighting the giant’: Gig workers around the world are finally organizing

by
Peter Guest
-
rest of world

Gig workers are connecting across borders to challenge platforms’ power and policies

Got Zoom fatigue? Out-of-sync brainwaves could be another reason videoconferencing is such a drag

by
Dr. Julie Boland
-
The Conversation

I was curious about why conversation felt more laborious and awkward over Zoom and other video-conferencing software.

How to Purchase an Applicant Tracking System

by
Dave Zielinski
-
SHRM

Experts say the first step in seeking a new ATS should be to evaluate your existing recruiting processes.

View All Articles

Events
No items found.
View All Events
Related Articles

Here’s what your future workforce will really look like

May 14, 2025

UNLEASH America 2025: HR leaders say ‘the very nature of work is changing before our eyes’

May 13, 2025

© 2024 recruiting news network.
all rights reserved.



Categories
Technology
Money
People
TA Ops
Events
Editorial
World
Career Advice
Resources
Diversity & Inclusion
TA Tech Marketplace
Information
AboutContactMedia KitPrivacy Policy
Subscribe to newsletter
