“The firm will be "aligning our workforce to better support our strategy." PwC

“We’re doing a strategic resource assessment.” Goldman Sachs

“We’re going to be reallocating our resources.” Anonymous

Ghee, whatever happen to being honest and speaking in plain English?

Let’s just call things what they are.

Goldman Sachs is culling the herd, so why don’t they just say so. It’s obvious that PwC is doing a layoff. Why are organizations renaming something that already has a name?

The Problem with Corporate Euphemisms

Companies often use vague or sanitized language when discussing job cuts. However, this approach can backfire. Here’s How:

Erosion of Trust: By avoiding direct language, companies risk damaging their credibility with employees. The use of euphemisms can be seen as an attempt to downplay the impact of layoffs or to make it appear that things aren’t that bad.

Confusion and Anxiety: Unclear communication can leave employees uncertain about their job security, leading to increased stress and decreased productivity. As a result, often the people you want to retain wind up leaving for more stable companies.

Cynicism: Over time, employees may become jaded and dismissive of corporate communications, assuming that positive-sounding phrases are masking negative realities.

The Impact on Employee Trust

The lack of straightforward communication contributes to a broader trust deficit in the workplace:

According to a recent Gallup poll, only 21% of U.S. employees strongly agree that they trust their organization's leadership.

This trust gap can have serious consequences for companies, including:

• Lower employee engagement
• Decreased productivity
• Higher turnover rates that are quite costly
• Difficulty attracting top talent
• Poor customer service and loss of business

‍

Read full article here