



Recruiting News Network
Recruiting
News
OperationsThe Recruiting Worx PodcastMoney + InvestmentsCareer AdviceWorld
Tech
DEI
People
People on the Move
The Leaders
The Makers
People
People on the Move
The Leaders
The Makers
Brand +
Marketing
Events
Labor +
Economics
SUBSCRIBE





Diversity + Equity + Inclusion

Require managers to ‘opt in’ to applicant information to reduce bias, study says

HR Dive

September 27, 2023

Diversity + Equity + Inclusion

Require managers to ‘opt in’ to applicant information to reduce bias, study says

HR Dive

September 27, 2023

Photo by Mikael Kristenson on Unsplash

Hiring bias could be reduced by allowing hiring managers to “opt in” to the information they want to see about a job candidate, rather than asking them to “opt out” of information they don’t want to see, according to a study from researchers at Cornell University and Duke University.

With an “opt in” process, hiring managers were less likely to choose to see potentially biasing applicant information, the researchers found. The option also preserved hiring managers’ autonomy.

“We found that having to actively select each piece of information leads individuals to be a little more thoughtful about what they’re selecting,” Sean Fath, assistant professor of organizational behavior at Cornell University, said in a statement.

“The main takeaway was that if you require people to actively opt into what information they want to see, as opposed to just giving it all to them and trusting them to opt out of the stuff likely to cause bias, you’ll get better outcomes in terms of what they ultimately choose to receive,” he said.

In the study, about 800 participants with hiring experience screened applicants for a hypothetical job position and decided who should advance to the interview stage. The participants received a checklist with seven items they could choose to see about the applicants. Five items included information typically requested in job applications, such as education credentials and work history, while two items — the applicant’s race and gender or the applicant’s name and picture — didn’t indicate job performance and could trigger bias.

As part of the experiment, participants were randomly assigned to either “opt in” to the items they wanted to see or “opt out” of the items they didn’t want to see. They were also randomly assigned to choose information they would like to see if they were screening applicants or what information they would like a peer to see when screening. In addition, they were randomly assigned to a checklist where they could choose to view the applicants’ race and gender, or the applicants’ name and photo.

Click for full article

In a study, hiring managers were asked whether they wanted to see applicants’ education credentials, work history, race and gender

What we're reading

‘We’re all fighting the giant’: Gig workers around the world are finally organizing

by
Peter Guest
-
rest of world

Gig workers are connecting across borders to challenge platforms’ power and policies

Got Zoom fatigue? Out-of-sync brainwaves could be another reason videoconferencing is such a drag

by
Dr. Julie Boland
-
The Conversation

I was curious about why conversation felt more laborious and awkward over Zoom and other video-conferencing software.

How to Purchase an Applicant Tracking System

by
Dave Zielinski
-
SHRM

Experts say the first step in seeking a new ATS should be to evaluate your existing recruiting processes.

View All Articles

Events
No items found.
View All Events
Related Articles

DEI Rollbacks: What Companies Are Doing in 2025

April 2, 2025

DEI rollbacks could exacerbate tech talent shortages – nearly half of recruitment leaders worry diversity cuts will impact their company’s appeal and employee retention

March 13, 2025

© 2024 recruiting news network.
all rights reserved.



Categories
Technology
Money
People
TA Ops
Events
Editorial
World
Career Advice
Resources
Diversity & Inclusion
TA Tech Marketplace
Information
AboutContactMedia KitPrivacy Policy
Subscribe to newsletter
