



Recruiting News Network
Recruiting
News
OperationsThe Recruiting Worx PodcastMoney + InvestmentsCareer AdviceWorld
Tech
DEI
People
People on the Move
The Leaders
The Makers
People
People on the Move
The Leaders
The Makers
Brand +
Marketing
Events
Labor +
Economics
SUBSCRIBE





Operations

Resume 'partitioning' can counter implicit bias in hiring, study says

HR Dive

July 30, 2020

Operations

Resume 'partitioning' can counter implicit bias in hiring, study says

HR Dive

July 30, 2020

Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash

DIVE BRIEF:

  • Countering implicit bias, or unconscious bias, in the recruitment process to improve talent pipeline diversity may be as simple as partitioning candidate applications into different categories, according to a group of researchers. The report, Let's choose one of each: Using the partition dependence effect to increase diversity in organizations, was published in May, and then a July 21 analysis by the authors in the Harvard Business Review (HBR) explained how categorizing applicants increases the probability that qualified, diverse applicants won't get overlooked.
  • The authors said that "partition dependence bias" can occur when a person has to select multiple options out of numerous, uncategorized options. If the options are grouped together by categories, an individual is more likely to choose some options from each group, thus creating a more diverse selection, the researchers said. In the study, 121 experienced HR managers were asked to review the profiles and resumes of 16 job applicants who graduated from four top universities. One group of HR professionals was given resumes in alphabetical order, but not organized by specific categories. Meanwhile, another group was given resumes categorized by university. All of the HR professionals were asked to select four candidates to interview.
  • In the group that received uncategorized resumes, 14% of HR managers chose candidates from all four universities, according to researchers. However, the percentage increased to 35% when the resumes were categorized by university. The researchers found the results were similar when candidates were categorized by gender, ethnicity and nationality. This method "only draws managers' attention to qualified minority candidates who might otherwise not attract their attention," the researchers said in HBR. However, they also noted that categorizing applicants is only effective if managers don't have strong biases against a particular group.

For the full analysis, please visit here.

‍

Implicit bias begins at the beginning.

What we're reading

‘We’re all fighting the giant’: Gig workers around the world are finally organizing

by
Peter Guest
-
rest of world

Gig workers are connecting across borders to challenge platforms’ power and policies

Got Zoom fatigue? Out-of-sync brainwaves could be another reason videoconferencing is such a drag

by
Dr. Julie Boland
-
The Conversation

I was curious about why conversation felt more laborious and awkward over Zoom and other video-conferencing software.

How to Purchase an Applicant Tracking System

by
Dave Zielinski
-
SHRM

Experts say the first step in seeking a new ATS should be to evaluate your existing recruiting processes.

View All Articles

Events

HR Minds Summit 2026

-
March 10, 2026
to
March 11, 2026

Applied AI in the Talent Journey

Philadelphia, PA
-
March 10, 2026
to
March 12, 2026

Strategic Talent Management Conference

Boston, MA
-
March 11, 2026
to
March 13, 2026
View All Events
Related Articles

The CHRO paradox: Is HR’s top role as secure as we’d hope in 2026?

HR Dive

January 29, 2026

Middle managers are feeling the pressure of flattened corporate structures. HR can help.

Mikaela Cohen

January 27, 2026

© 2024 recruiting news network.
all rights reserved.



Categories
Technology
Money
People
TA Ops
Events
Editorial
World
Career Advice
Resources
Diversity & Inclusion
TA Tech Marketplace
Information
AboutContactMedia KitPrivacy Policy
Subscribe to newsletter
