The trend in 2025 shows companies shifting towards smaller, incremental layoffs—referred to as 'rolling layoffs'—rather than massive, sudden firings. This approach aims to minimize disruption while aligning workforce size with strategic goals, as seen in sectors like tech and media. However, this method raises questions about job security and the mental health of employees.

Introduction to Rolling Layoffs: A New Trend in Workforce Management

In recent years, the concept of rolling layoffs has emerged as a prevalent strategy among companies for workforce management. This approach entails conducting smaller, more frequent rounds of layoffs throughout the year, rather than implementing large, sudden cuts all at once. Companies are increasingly adopting this method to strategically manage operational disruptions and reduce costs without garnering significant negative attention from large-scale downsizing events. As detailed in an Axios article, more than half of the layoffs in 2025 involved fewer than 50 employees, highlighting a shift in corporate layoff strategies towards smaller scale, rolling reductions.

Understanding the Shift to Small, Incremental Job Cuts

The trend toward rolling layoffs, also known as small or incremental job cuts, has become increasingly prevalent across various industries. According to a report by Axios, over half of the layoffs in 2025 involved fewer than 50 employees, marking a significant shift from the traditional approach of larger, more publicized mass layoffs. Companies are opting for this approach to gradually adjust their workforce size in line with business strategies, operational demands, and financial realities, which in turn helps minimize the disruption and negative publicity associated with large-scale layoffs.

One of the main advantages of rolling layoffs is the ability to manage workforce reductions more discreetly, which can help protect a company's brand reputation and maintain investor confidence. This method allows firms to continuously reshape their organizational structure to match evolving strategic goals without triggering the destabilizing effects of mass layoffs. While this approach reduces sudden shocks to workplace morale, it also creates a lingering sense of uncertainty among employees. Workers may feel a constant undercurrent of insecurity, even though these incremental adjustments are meant to align with company objectives such as agility and cost optimization.

The reasons behind this shift to smaller, repetitive layoffs include the need to adapt quickly to fast-changing market conditions and the pace of technological advancements. For instance, in the technology sector, companies like Meta have implemented targeted layoffs within their AI teams to refocus resources and streamline operations. As highlighted in Axios' report, reducing team sizes allows for increased concentration on high-impact projects and boosts the individual accountability of team members while cutting down operational complexities.

‍

Read full article here