



Recruiting News Network
Recruiting
News
OperationsThe Recruiting Worx PodcastMoney + InvestmentsCareer AdviceWorld
Tech
DEI
People
People on the Move
The Leaders
The Makers
People
People on the Move
The Leaders
The Makers
Brand +
Marketing
Events
Labor +
Economics
SUBSCRIBE





Crime + Justice

Staffing company sued for allegedly rejecting applicant born outside the US

RNN News Update

June 30, 2022

Crime + Justice

Staffing company sued for allegedly rejecting applicant born outside the US

RNN News Update

June 30, 2022

Dive Brief:

  • A manufacturing staffing company allegedly violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act when it refused to refer a naturalized citizen for employment with a government contractor because she was born in Germany and not the U.S., the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission said in a lawsuit (EEOC v. Employbridge of Dallas, Inc. d/b/a ResourceMFG, No. 22-499 (W.D. Okla. June 17, 2022)).
  • During a walk-in interview in February 2020, a woman met with a ResourceMFG recruiter at the company’s Oklahoma City office, according to the lawsuit. The recruiter told her she would be a good fit for a temp-to-hire job with XPO Logistics, a government contractor. She completed paperwork for a first-shift warehouse position, and the recruiter told her to produce identification and other necessary documents, including her U.S. birth certificate, the EEOC alleged. The woman explained that as a naturalized citizen who was born in Germany, she didn’t have a U.S. birth certificate but did have documents to show she is a U.S. citizen. The recruiter told her she wasn’t qualified for the job because she was born in Germany and sent her home, according to the complaint.
  • Based on ResourceMFG’s alleged actions, the EEOC sued the company for national origin discrimination. Pursuant to its government contract, XPO required temporary and permanent employees to be U.S. citizens but not that they be born in the U.S., the lawsuit said. “Staffing companies providing workers to government contractors cannot add additional requirements, such as U.S. birth certificates, to their selection process,” Andrea G. Baran, an EEOC regional attorney, stated in a release. ResourceMFG did not respond to a request for a statement before press time.

For an analysis, please visit HR Dive

Company accused of discrimination by EEOC

What we're reading

‘We’re all fighting the giant’: Gig workers around the world are finally organizing

by
Peter Guest
-
rest of world

Gig workers are connecting across borders to challenge platforms’ power and policies

Got Zoom fatigue? Out-of-sync brainwaves could be another reason videoconferencing is such a drag

by
Dr. Julie Boland
-
The Conversation

I was curious about why conversation felt more laborious and awkward over Zoom and other video-conferencing software.

How to Purchase an Applicant Tracking System

by
Dave Zielinski
-
SHRM

Experts say the first step in seeking a new ATS should be to evaluate your existing recruiting processes.

View All Articles

Events

Hire Virtue's Hiring Blitz & Job Fair

Houston, TX
-
to
August 6, 2025
View All Events
Related Articles

Accessing worker’s personal emails may violate federal privacy laws, appeals court warns

March 1, 2023

Apple illegally interfered with employees’ protected activity

HR Dive

February 8, 2023

© 2024 recruiting news network.
all rights reserved.



Categories
Technology
Money
People
TA Ops
Events
Editorial
World
Career Advice
Resources
Diversity & Inclusion
TA Tech Marketplace
Information
AboutContactMedia KitPrivacy Policy
Subscribe to newsletter
