Photo by Zulfugar Karimov on Unsplash
In many corporate boardrooms, artificial intelligence is treated like a deployment: choose a tool, publish a policy, run a training, count the logins. By those measures, the AI era is already here. Leaders report broad adoption, clear strategies, and a workforce eager to experiment.
But a new survey of 5,000 knowledge workers across the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada suggests a less flattering truth: employees are using AI, yes — just not in ways that meaningfully change how work gets done. The result is a familiar corporate mirage: high activity, low impact.
For senior HR leaders, this isn’t a technical shortcoming. It’s a capability and operating-model failure — and it sits squarely in the terrain HR owns: skills, manager expectations, role design, and performance measurement.
The report argues that “AI proficiency” has shifted underneath organizations’ feet.
In 2025, proficiency largely meant baseline fluency: understanding what AI is, how to avoid obvious data risks, and how to write a serviceable prompt. Companies invested heavily in those table-stakes skills, with predictable outcomes. Employees learned to ask AI to summarize emails, rewrite messages, or provide quick answers.
In 2026, the bar has moved again. Proficiency now means something more demanding and more operational: incorporating AI into real, value-adding tasks every week. Not AI as an occasional helper, but AI as a regular component of workflows that matter — the point where productivity gains can compound into enterprise return on investment.
The report’s central finding is blunt: most organizations have not crossed that threshold.
Three years after ChatGPT’s launch, the dominant mode of AI use remains superficial.
Most workers fall into what the report calls “AI experimenters”: people who use AI for basic tasks like meeting-note summaries, email rewrites, and quick informational searches. The second-largest group are “AI novices,” who either do not use AI at all or tried it a few times and stopped. Only a small sliver qualify as “AI practitioners” — those who integrate AI into workflows and report significant productivity gains — and an even smaller fraction as true experts.
Read full article here