Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping entire industries, and recruitment is no exception. Companies using AI-driven tools for recruitment are 200% more likely to meet some or all of their hiring goals compared to those that don’t use these technologies. This enables hiring teams to identify top talent faster, improve their quality of hire and significantly reduce the time it takes to fill crucial positions. However, the more these systems become integral to hiring processes, the more they cause concerns about transparency.

The black box problem refers to the opacity of certain AI systems. Recruiters know what information they feed into an AI tool (the input), and they can see the results of their query (the output). But everything that happens in the middle of AI’s black box is a mystery.

While AI might recommend certain candidates for a role, recruiters don’t necessarily know why they’ve been cherry-picked. In some cases, deeper AI learning models have become so advanced that even their creators don’t fully comprehend how they work or why certain candidates are highlighted. This lack of transparency raises significant concerns about fairness, bias and accountability in hiring practices.

The Risks Of Bias In AI Recruitment

AI is only as good as the data it learns from. When that data reflects societal biases such as gender, race, age or other factors, those biases seep into AI-driven recruitment tools. A University of Washington study found racial, gender and intersectional biases in how three state-of-the-art language models ranked resumes.

Addressing bias in AI recruitment requires deliberate ethical development. At Juicebox, for example, we promote transparency by providing detailed reasoning for every recommendation our platform makes, including a rating, an explanation for this rating and whether there was sufficient data to form this conclusion. This approach helps prompt recruiters to ask the right follow-up questions during interviews.

Transparency must also extend to candidates. Employers willing to disclose their usage of AI tools and offer examples of their outputs will build trust and elevate their employer brand. Jobseekers are more inclined to apply to companies willing to explain their hiring decisions—it’s a giant leap toward leveling the playing field and giving everyone their shot.

The Digital Exclusion Problem

Another problem: We can’t see which data is omitted from an AI’s black box either. While AI systems aim to cast a wider net for talent, these tools sometimes leave certain candidates behind. AI’s training data often favor candidates with extensive digital footprints—often younger, tech-savvy individuals.

Candidates from older generations or people who shy away from creating online profiles may also be disadvantaged. Less information is available about them online, so AI systems may have less data to represent them accurately to recruiters.

‍

Read full article here