



Recruiting News Network
Recruiting
News
OperationsThe Recruiting Worx PodcastMoney + InvestmentsCareer AdviceWorld
Tech
DEI
People
People on the Move
The Leaders
The Makers
People
People on the Move
The Leaders
The Makers
Brand +
Marketing
Events
Labor +
Economics
SUBSCRIBE





Operations

The blurry overlap of political and protected speech

HR Dive

August 10, 2020

Operations

The blurry overlap of political and protected speech

HR Dive

August 10, 2020

Photo by Saketh Garuda on Unsplash

As the U.S. dives into an election cycle during which presidential candidates will compete with a pandemic for attention, employers can be sure of one thing: political speech will make its way into the workplace.

When workers get political, how can employers respond? Two federal laws, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), offer some guidance, according to Randy Coffey, Fisher Phillips partner, and Steven Bernstein, co-chair of Fisher Phillips' labor relations practice.

It's OK to curb political speech

‍Employees' political discussions and actions at work create risk for employers, Coffey said. Employers may want to discourage on-the-job politics, then.

"There's some incentive in my view for employers to think carefully about making clear to everybody that maybe work isn't the best place to have intense political or social discussions, although it's also difficult to stop," Coffey said.

Bernstein echoed Coffey's sentiment, noting that employers may want to regulate political speech in the workplace for "a host of reasons" — productivity, emotion and conflict among them.

But curb it evenly and carefully‍

As employers consider how to discourage political activity in the workplace, they need to ensure they do so evenly, both Coffey and Bernstein warned.

Title VII requires that individuals in protected groups be treated in an equal fashion. Specifically, it prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, sex, national origin, color and religion. "So the key things for employers to keep in mind, if you're imposing discipline, is to be sure that you're doing so in an even handed manner," Coffey said.

If an employer has a dress code, for example, it needs to ensure the dress code is enforced evenly. An employer may allow workers to wear shirts — or, in these times, masks — expressing support for one presidential candidate. That's fine, but "if there are individuals in protected groups expressing another view, you can't single them out with some kind of disciplinary action," Coffey said. Adverse employment actions, Coffey emphasized, make up one of the key elements of Title VII claims.

For more, please click here

‍

When workers get political, how can employers respond? Two federal laws offer some guidance.

What we're reading

‘We’re all fighting the giant’: Gig workers around the world are finally organizing

by
Peter Guest
-
rest of world

Gig workers are connecting across borders to challenge platforms’ power and policies

Got Zoom fatigue? Out-of-sync brainwaves could be another reason videoconferencing is such a drag

by
Dr. Julie Boland
-
The Conversation

I was curious about why conversation felt more laborious and awkward over Zoom and other video-conferencing software.

How to Purchase an Applicant Tracking System

by
Dave Zielinski
-
SHRM

Experts say the first step in seeking a new ATS should be to evaluate your existing recruiting processes.

View All Articles

Events
No items found.
View All Events
Related Articles

The power of partnership: How CEOs and HR leaders can lead transformation together

May 5, 2025

17% of employees who use AI at work do so to avoid co-worker judgment: But workplace connection ‘is a key to finding happiness’

April 28, 2025

© 2024 recruiting news network.
all rights reserved.



Categories
Technology
Money
People
TA Ops
Events
Editorial
World
Career Advice
Resources
Diversity & Inclusion
TA Tech Marketplace
Information
AboutContactMedia KitPrivacy Policy
Subscribe to newsletter
