



Recruiting News Network
Recruiting
News
OperationsThe Recruiting Worx PodcastMoney + InvestmentsCareer AdviceWorld
Tech
DEI
People
People on the Move
The Leaders
The Makers
People
People on the Move
The Leaders
The Makers
Brand +
Marketing
Events
Labor +
Economics
SUBSCRIBE





Hiring Intel

What Did the Candidate Actually Do? Finding the 'I' in the 'We'

April 16, 2025

Hiring Intel

What Did the Candidate Actually Do? Finding the 'I' in the 'We'

April 16, 2025

Photo by Maranda Vandergriff on Unsplash

Sometimes when you are interviewing, you may find yourself stuck in the “we-eds.” That’s when every response from your candidate starts with “we” — “we” accomplished this or “we” struggled with that.

Candidates use “we” for two reasons: one noble and one nefarious.

Noble use: “I feel uncomfortable bragging, and I want you to think I’m a team player.”

Nefarious use: “I wasn’t that involved, but I’d like to take credit for it anyway.”

Regardless of whether it’s noble or nefarious, it is important to understand the candidate’s personal role.

Why?

Because you aren’t hiring the rest of that team. You are hiring this person.

How to get out of the “we-eds”

Fortunately, getting past the “we” phrasing is usually straightforward.

You: “What was the biggest innovation you drove at ABC?”

Candidate: “We ended up delivering a major revamp in our information design that dramatically improved the user experience. We saw a 35% increase in usage just from making the tool easier to use.”

At this point, it is critical that you avoid making any assumptions or passing any judgment on the “we” response. We don’t know whether our candidate is seeking undue credit or merely being humble.

Aim your questions squarely at the candidate’s role

There’s no need to say, “Hey, candidate, for this interview, can you kill the ‘we’ part and tell me what you did?” For many candidates, this might make them feel like they have to adopt an unnatural way of talking about themselves.

Instead, here’s your first follow-up:

“What was your biggest contribution to that effort?”

You have now invited them to talk about their own role, and most candidates will share this openly.

Some, however, still won’t feel comfortable — either because of extreme “humility programming” or, conversely, because they didn’t really contribute that much.

‍

Read full article here

Sometimes when you are interviewing, you may find yourself stuck in the “we-eds.”

What we're reading

‘We’re all fighting the giant’: Gig workers around the world are finally organizing

by
Peter Guest
-
rest of world

Gig workers are connecting across borders to challenge platforms’ power and policies

Got Zoom fatigue? Out-of-sync brainwaves could be another reason videoconferencing is such a drag

by
Dr. Julie Boland
-
The Conversation

I was curious about why conversation felt more laborious and awkward over Zoom and other video-conferencing software.

How to Purchase an Applicant Tracking System

by
Dave Zielinski
-
SHRM

Experts say the first step in seeking a new ATS should be to evaluate your existing recruiting processes.

View All Articles

Events

Detecting AI in Hiring: Ensuring Fair Candidate Assessment

Online
-
to
August 20, 2025

Marketing Brew Summit

New York, NY
-
to
September 10, 2025

Indeed FutureWorks

New Orleans, LA
-
September 10, 2025
to
September 11, 2025
View All Events
Related Articles

7 strategies to attract top talent in a competitive job market

Insperity

August 15, 2025

Death to resumes: Why it’s time to rethink how we evaluate talent

Heidi Barnett

August 14, 2025

© 2024 recruiting news network.
all rights reserved.



Categories
Technology
Money
People
TA Ops
Events
Editorial
World
Career Advice
Resources
Diversity & Inclusion
TA Tech Marketplace
Information
AboutContactMedia KitPrivacy Policy
Subscribe to newsletter
