



Recruiting News Network
Recruiting
News
OperationsThe Recruiting Worx PodcastMoney + InvestmentsCareer AdviceWorld
Tech
DEI
People
People on the Move
The Leaders
The Makers
People
People on the Move
The Leaders
The Makers
Brand +
Marketing
Events
Labor +
Economics
SUBSCRIBE





Hiring Intel

AI in hiring leaves most job seekers rejected without a conversation

Jack Campbell

October 22, 2026

Hiring Intel

AI in hiring leaves most job seekers rejected without a conversation

Jack Campbell

October 22, 2026

Photo by Zach M on Unsplash

At least four in five job seekers in the United States, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia and Germany were rejected for a role in the past year without speaking to anyone at the hiring company, according to new research on AI in hiring from Greenhouse.

The Future of Hiring Candidate Report 2026 surveyed 2,832 active job seekers aged 18 to 64. Of the 302 Australian respondents, 85 per cent said they had been turned down without a single conversation. That compares with 81 per cent in the US and in the UK and Ireland, and 86 per cent in Germany.

Tom Hyde, head of sales and revenue for Asia-Pacific at Greenhouse told HRD the findings show both sides of the hiring market are using artificial intelligence (AI), and both are unhappy with the result.

“It’s the doom loop of candidates feel like they need to do it to stand out,” Hyde said. “Recruiters are drowning in volume because the candidates can use AI to apply so many times, multiple jobs, multiple roles, you know, create this volume.”

How AI in hiring created a volume problem

Candidate use of AI is now close to universal. According to the report, 84 per cent of Australian job seekers used AI in their search, alongside 87 per cent in Germany, 78 per cent in the UK and Ireland, and 77 per cent in the US.

Much of that use is aimed at beating automated screening. Among US respondents, 62 per cent tried at least one tactic to get past screening software. Of those, 40 per cent added skills or keywords they do not have, and a third inserted hidden text aimed at an AI reviewer.

Candidates are also working to disguise their use of the tools. Just over half (51 per cent) of Australian respondents rewrote an application so it would not appear AI-generated.

Hyde said traditional screening signals are losing their value as a result. He described a Melbourne-based customer who was recruiting a chief marketing officer. She had shortlisted 12 applicants, and six of them submitted cover letters.

‍

Read full article here

Greenhouse data from 2,832 job seekers shows candidates will accept AI interviews, but only with human review and clear rules.

What we're reading

‘We’re all fighting the giant’: Gig workers around the world are finally organizing

by
Peter Guest
-
rest of world

Gig workers are connecting across borders to challenge platforms’ power and policies

Got Zoom fatigue? Out-of-sync brainwaves could be another reason videoconferencing is such a drag

by
Dr. Julie Boland
-
The Conversation

I was curious about why conversation felt more laborious and awkward over Zoom and other video-conferencing software.

How to Purchase an Applicant Tracking System

by
Dave Zielinski
-
SHRM

Experts say the first step in seeking a new ATS should be to evaluate your existing recruiting processes.

View All Articles

Events
No items found.
View All Events
Related Articles

Large employers are hiring part-time workers over seasonal ones, Indeed data shows

Lara Ewen

October 21, 2026

Promotions and internal hires slowed in 2026, but workers still see lots of upheaval thanks to AI, Workday says

Paige McGlauflin

October 19, 2026

© 2024 recruiting news network.
all rights reserved.



Categories
Technology
Money
People
TA Ops
Events
Editorial
World
Career Advice
Resources
Diversity & Inclusion
TA Tech Marketplace
Information
AboutContactMedia KitPrivacy Policy
Subscribe to newsletter
