Artificial Intelligence (AI) has quickly become a cornerstone of the modern recruitment process.

Its capacity to handle vast amounts of data, identify patterns, and streamline decisions has made it an invaluable tool for organizations looking to fill roles faster and more efficiently.

Simultaneously, job seekers are using AI to enhance their applications and gain a competitive edge.

However, this widespread adoption is not without consequence.

The growing role of AI in hiring has exposed a deep and widening trust gap between employers and job candidates, one that threatens to upend the delicate balance of the recruitment ecosystem.

Gartner research has revealed the complexity of this tension.

On the one hand, candidates are wary of how AI evaluates their applications, questioning its fairness, accuracy, and impartiality.

On the other, employers are grappling with the rise of AI-driven candidate fraud – where job seekers leverage technology not just to enhance applications, but in some cases to misrepresent their qualifications or identities altogether.

This dual challenge has forced recruiters to ask a fundamental question: How can they harness the benefits of AI while maintaining trust, fairness, and transparency in the hiring process?

The candidate perspective: Mistrust of AI in the recruitment process

For job candidates, the rapid integration of AI into recruitment has sparked significant unease.

A March 2025 Gartner survey revealed that only 26% of candidates trust AI to evaluate them fairly, even though more than half believe AI is used to screen their application materials.

This disparity highlights a growing mistrust of AI, rooted in concerns about bias, dehumanization, and a lack of transparency.

Many candidates worry that AI systems treat them as mere data points rather than as individuals with unique skills and experiences.

Unlike human recruiters, who can account for nuances and context, AI is often perceived as inflexible. The fear that an algorithm might unfairly disqualify them – whether due to errors, incomplete data, or biased programming – is a persistent concern for job seekers.

In addition, there is a sense that AI-driven processes strip away the personal connections that are central to building trust during recruitment.

Beyond these worries about fairness and personalization, candidates are also skeptical of the legitimacy of the hiring process itself.

Read the full article here.