As AI transforms the workplace at breakneck speed, a paradox has emerged that should keep every HR executive up at night. While organizations rush to implement AI tools with promises of enhanced productivity, they’re simultaneously creating deeper workforce anxieties and skill gaps that threaten employee engagement and retention.

Recent research from the employer reviews site Glassdoor reveals the stark reality: more than half of workers (56%) say AI adoption has made them question their long-term job security. When employees mention AI in company reviews, three out of five comments skew negative, expressing fears about AI taking over creative roles and job displacement. That drives real behavioral changes, with 71% feeling pressure to learn new skills because of AI.

The numbers become more concerning alongside data from telecom company Lightyear showing that while about half of the workforce (49%) actively fears AI will replace its jobs, only 10% is taking concrete steps to upskill. That preparation gap creates a dicey scenario where most of the workforce feels threatened but remains passive, potentially leading to lower engagement, more turnover and a skills deficit that could cripple companies’ AI initiatives.

The generational divide adds complexity HR leaders must navigate carefully. While 67% of Gen Z workers are actively learning AI skills and 44% of millennials and Gen Z view AI as fair, only 21% of Gen Xers and 18% of boomers share that confidence. That trust gap threatens workforce fragmentation precisely when cohesion is critical for successful AI implementation.

Perhaps most troubling is the disconnect between leadership perception and employee experience. Research from IT firm GoTo indicates that while 91% of IT leaders believe their companies effectively use AI to support remote and hybrid workers, only 53% of employees agree — a gap suggesting that many AI initiatives are failing at ground level despite significant investment.

Meanwhile, the latest report from WalkMe, a digital adoption platform, reveals a dangerous inversion: the employees who use AI tools most frequently — Gen Z, frontline staff, specialists — are least likely to receive proper training, guidance or permission to use it. Thus, much of the workforce operates in a gray area, using AI without oversight and creating risks in compliance and quality of work.

“This top-heavy approach isn’t just inefficient, it’s risky,” warns Sharon Bernstein, CHRO at WalkMe. “It undermines trust, amplifies pressure, and creates what I call a dangerous assumption of fluency.” Enterprises lost an estimated average of $104 million last year because of underused AI tools, poor rollout and a drag in productivity.

Read the full article here.